Reference-level diagnostics
Compare submitted FRELs and proposed jurisdictional reference levels with independent stock-and-change estimates over aligned historical periods.

Jurisdictional analytics
Pantropic develops spatially explicit analysis for governments, program partners, investors and technical teams working at national and subnational scales.
The work connects forest-carbon measurement to the practical decisions behind reference levels, program design, ART TREES readiness, nesting and ongoing monitoring.
What we analyze
Jurisdictional accounting can produce materially different conclusions depending on which forest processes are measured, how uncertainty is treated and whether the reference level is aligned with the program’s real intervention pathway.
Compare submitted FRELs and proposed jurisdictional reference levels with independent stock-and-change estimates over aligned historical periods.
Test whether within-forest biomass loss is being captured alongside deforestation, and quantify its contribution to historical emissions.
Map and quantify uncertainty rather than relying on broad default assumptions, with implications traced through crediting-level construction.
Translate spatial results into decisions for ART TREES, nesting, monitoring-system design, technical engagement and investment diligence.
Protected analysis
The detailed maps, jurisdiction-level comparisons and reference-level findings are available in a protected results area while publication permissions are being reviewed.
View the current analytical results and supporting notes using credentials provided by Pantropic Advisors. No ChatGPT account is required.
View protected resultsApply the analysis
Discuss reference levels, degradation accounting, ART TREES readiness, nesting or a tailored jurisdictional assessment.
Request a proposal